American whistleblower John Mitchell Barnett (February 23, 1962 – March 9, 2024) was well-known for his verified safety and quality reports the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner production and his death, which transpired during a lawsuit he filed against the company.
John Barnett and South Carolina:
His accusations about emergency oxygen systems not working validated Boeing’s internal investigations, and in 2017 the FAA ordered corrective action in response his complaints regarding metal shavings and non-conforming parts. Following that, Barnett filed a whistleblower complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) through the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Whistleblower Protection Programmed, or AIR 21. In 2021, OSHA concluded the case in Boeing’s favor following a four-year inquiry.
Barnett and his lawyers revised the initial lawsuit and filed an appeal of the ruling in 2021, claiming that Boeing had “undermined his career because he had raised safety concerns,” a claim that the corporation refuted. Following his non-attendance on the third day of his deposition in March 2024, he discovered deceased from a gunshot wound. The wound reported as self-inflicted by the Charleston County coroner. Charleston Police Department is looking into his death. His whistleblower lawsuit against Boeing was still unresolved as of March 12 and would carried out by his estate.
John Barnett dead in the United States, BBC Reports:
Barnett, John According the BBC, a former employee of Boeing who voiced worries about the company’s production standards discovered dead in the US. Before retiring in 2017, John Barnett spent more than 30 years working at Boeing. He had been providing testimony in a whistleblower case against the firm in the days preceding his passing. Boeing expressed their sorrow at learning of Mr. Barnett’s demise. He passed away, the Charleston County coroner told the BBC on Monday. It stated that authorities were looking into the 62-year-old’s death on March 9th from a “self-inflicted” wound.
Up to the year of John Barnett Retirement:
Before retiring from the US aircraft company in 2017 because health issues, Mr. Barnett had worked there for thirty years. He started working as a quality manager at the North Charleston plant in 2010. The plant produces the 787 Dreamliner, a cutting-edge aircraft mostly utilized for long-haul flights. In 2019, Mr. Barnett revealed the BBC that workers under duress had purposefully installed inferior parts on aero planes while they were in construction. He also said he had uncovered serious problems with oxygen systems, which could mean one in four breathing masks would not work in an emergency. He said soon after starting work in South Carolina he had become concerned that the push get new aircraft built meant the assembly process rushed and safety compromised, something the company denied.
Track Components Through the Factory:
He said in some cases, sub-standard parts had even removed from scrap bins and fitted planes that were being built prevent delays on the production line. He also claimed that tests on emergency oxygen systems due fitted the 787 showed a failure rate of 25%, meaning that one in four could fail deploy in a real-life emergency. Mr. Barnett said he had alerted managers his concerns, but no action had taken. Boeing denied his assertions.
However, a 2017 review by the US regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), did uphold some of Mr. Barnett’s concerns. It established that the location of at least 53 “non-conforming” parts in the factory was unknown, and that they considered lost. Boeing ordered take remedial action. On the oxygen cylinders issue, the company said that in 2017 it had “identified some oxygen bottles received from the supplier that were not deploying properly”. But it denied that any of them actually fitted on aircraft.
John Barnett After Retiring:
He embarked on a long-running legal action against the company. He accused it of denigrating his character and hampering his career because of the issues he pointed out charges rejected by Boeing. At the time of his death, Mr. Barnett had been in Charleston for legal interviews linked that case. Last week, he gave formal deposition in which he questioned by Boeing’s lawyers, before being cross-examined by his own counsel. He had been due undergo further questioning on Saturday. When he did not appear, enquiries made at his hotel. He subsequently found dead in his truck in the hotel car park. Speaking the BBC, his lawyer described his death as tragic. In a statement Boeing said: We saddened by Mr. Barnett’s passing, and our thoughts with his family and friends.
After Dead John Barnett Family Said:
The family of Barnett stated that “he was looking forward having his day in court and hoped that it would force Boeing change its culture,” as well as that “he was suffering from PTSD and anxiety attacks as a result of subjected the hostile work environment at Boeing which we believe led his death. According a lady claiming be Barnett’s acquaintance, Barnett said her, If anything happens me, it’s not suicide. According her, “they made his death look like a suicide. A statement from Boeing read, “We saddened by Mr. Barnett’s death, and our thoughts with his friends and family.” He had moved Pineville, Louisiana, be closer his mother at the time of his death. According his lawyers, the case will still proceed trial in June.
Conclusion :
The life and death of John Mitchell Barnett serve as a poignant reminder of the challenges faced by whistleblowers in corporate environments. Barnett’s unwavering commitment to safety and integrity led him to confront one of the largest aircraft manufacturers in the world, Boeing. Despite facing obstacles and experiencing personal hardships, Barnett remained steadfast in his pursuit of justice. His legacy will endure as a testament to the importance of speaking out against wrongdoing, even in the face of adversity.
_______________________________________________________________________
FAQs:
Q: Who was John Mitchell Barnett?
A: John Mitchell Barnett was an American whistleblower who worked at Boeing and raised concerns about safety issues within the company’s 787 Dreamliner production.
Q: What were John Barnett’s allegations against Boeing?
A: Barnett alleged various safety concerns, including problems with emergency oxygen systems, the use of inferior parts, and compromised safety standards due to rushed production processes.
Q: Did John Barnett’s allegations lead to any actions by regulatory authorities?
A: Yes, Barnett’s concerns prompted investigations by regulatory authorities such as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which ordered corrective actions in response to some of his complaints.
Q: What was the outcome of John Barnett’s legal battle against Boeing?
A: Barnett’s legal battle against Boeing was ongoing at the time of his death. He accused the company of undermining his career and character due to his safety concerns. The case was scheduled to proceed to trial.
Q: How did John Barnett’s story end?
A: Tragically, John Barnett was found dead from a gunshot wound, which was reported as self-inflicted. His death occurred amid his legal battle against Boeing, leaving unanswered questions about the circumstances surrounding his demise.
